I found an excellent deal at Best Buy on a
Crucial MX500 1TB SATA SSD that I simply could not pass up. At the time of this writing, the SSD was on sale for $89.99. But to muddy things, the
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB just dropped to $101.95 at Amazon. I strongly considered canceling the MX500 in favor of the 860 EVO, but decided to leave things alone. After all, 12 bucks is, well... 12 bucks.
After checking multiple reviews, I learned that the MX500 is very close in performance to Samsung's EVO line. The differences are so negligible for everyday use as to not matter. Considering that I will use the MX500 mainly for file storage, the differences will matter even less. My Windows operating system will continue to use the Samsung 850 Pro (256GB), which is currently divided in 2 partitions.
As far as endurance is concerned, the MX500 1TB is rated for 360 terabyte written (TBW), whereas the 860 EVO 1TB is rated for 600 TBW. So far, my Samsung 850 Pro is barely at 17 TBW after over 5 years of steady use, so I'm not concerned that 360 TBW might not be enough. Besides, both sport a 5-year warranty. Just for reference, the older 850 EVO 1TB is "only" rated for 150 TBW, which is the same as my 850 Pro.
I will install the new MX500 as a secondary drive to hold all my files, music, photos, videos, etc. I will repartition the Samsung 850 Pro into a single, dedicated drive for the operating system, and the new MX500 will take the place of D Drive. The MX500 will also allow me to replace a very old Plextor 128GB SSD. Remember that dinosaur?